Order of the Supreme Court of India in the matter of Nikunj Developers Vs Videocon Tower A Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Others dated 26/07/2022.
The SC, February 17, 2022 had directed the appellant (Veena Developers) to submit a proposal to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai for sanctioning of 227 car parking spaces. This would be inclusive of the 25 per cent discretionary quota of the Municipal Commissioner. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai would consider the proposal in accordance with the Development Control Rules and take a decision within a period of one month. The appellant after getting the proposal sanctioned should take necessary steps for compliance so as to assuage the grievance of the cooperative societies in regard to the absence of car parking spaces, the SC order of February 17, 2022 said.
Further, in addition to the submission of the proposal for 227 car parking spaces, the appellant shall submit, within a period of two weeks, an additional proposal for sanctioning of 124 car parking spaces (thus, making a total of 351 car parking spaces).
The SC, July 26, 2022 noted that the directions of the court have not been complied with, despite the passage of nearly five months.
The Supreme Court, July 26, 2022 directed:
Links:
[1] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/order-supreme-court-india-regarding-car-parking-space-housing-societies-mumbai-maharashtra
[2] http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Videocon-Tower-parking-SC_Order_26-Jul-2022.pdf
[3] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/urban-housing
[4] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/parking-policy
[5] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/mumbai
[6] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/municipal-corporations
[7] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/supreme-court
[8] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/maharashtra