During the second week of the meeting, it became clear that there were four main areas of contention. In climate jargon, these were: sinks, supplementarity, compliance, and funding for adaptation. A note by Pronk to address these issues in what he considered a balanced manner, presented two days before the conference was to end, was not accepted by any of the groups. The us dismissed the note as
Technology Partners: MimirTech
Links:
[1] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/feature-article/crunch-issues
[2] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/newspaper/down-earth
[3] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/unfccc
[4] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/climate-change
[5] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/global-warming
[6] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/kyoto-protocol
[7] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/emissions-trading
[8] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/joint-implementation
[9] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/netherlands
[10] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/developing-countries
[11] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/european-union-eu
