Who are the beneficiaries from participative approaches in conservation - the people or the wildlife. The authors compare two protected areas Amarakaeri Communal Reserve in Peru and Selous Game Reserve in Tanzania and show how in similar institutional settings local interest groups react very differently to the possibility of participation.
Technology Partners: MimirTech
Links:
[1] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/feature-article/who-gains-community-conservation
[2] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/author/tobias-haller
[3] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/author/marc-galvin
[4] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/author/patrick-meroka-et-al
[5] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/journal/journal-environment-development
[6] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/cost-benefit-analysis
[7] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/land-use
[8] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/tribals
[9] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/protected-area-conservation
[10] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/wildlife-and-people
[11] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/public-participation
[12] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/tanzania
[13] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/peru
[14] http://admin.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/category/thesaurus/wildlife
