S Lalitha Bangalore, April 30, DHNS

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) has decided to ask the State government to bear the excess expenditure that has come up while executing works related to the Second phase of Cauvery Water Supply Project Stage IV.

Shashidhar Gargeshwari, Chamarajnagar, April 19, DH News Service:

The Tamil Nadu Government has hastened the work on the Rs 1,334-crore Hogenakal drinking water project amid controversy.

The watch tower constructed by the Tamil Nadu government at the controversial Nadugadde region in Hogenakal. DH photo

A considerable portion of the wall lining the open canal that runs between the Shiva anaicut (Shivanasamudra in Mandya district) and the Netkal Balancing Reservoir (NBR) and carries Cauvery waters to Bangalore breached recently.

CHENNAI: The second Cauvery Combined Drinking Water Scheme will be implemented at a cost of Rs.47.74 crore and will benefit Kankeyam town panchayat (now elevated as municipality), Vellakoil Municipality and 174 rural habitations, Deputy Chief Minister M.K. Stalin said on Monday.

VELLORE: Work on the Cauvery Integrated Drinking Water Supply Scheme to be implemented at a cost of Rs.1,800 crore to bring water from the Cauvery River to Vellore district would be started soon, according to Deputy Chief Minister M.K. Stalin.

S Lalitha, Bangalore, April 1, DH News Service:

When the Second Phase of the Cauvery Stage IV project gets commissioned by 2011 end, the City will end up utilising every drop of the 19 TMC feet of water allocated to it by the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal.

It means end of the road to augmenting City

With the Tamil Nadu opposition parties, the AIADMK and the PMK, accusing the ruling DMK of not implementing the Hogenakkal drinking water project, using the Cauvery water, the dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu is back in the limelight.

Gokul Chandrasekar | ENS

State Planning Commission member argues it will be a cheaper and more effective way to check pollution load

Ramaswamy R. Iyer

The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal was established in 1990, under the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, at a specific direction of the Supreme Court. Ironically, and despite a constitutional and statutory bar on jurisdiction, the court has made it very difficult for the Tribunal to function in accordance with the Act.

Three years have passed since the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) gave its final award on inter-State sharing of the river waters.

Pages